How Praxigen compares
Specialty practices handle prior authorization three ways: by hand, with payer-side and clearinghouse tools, or with a provider-side workspace like Praxigen. They solve different problems. Here is the honest comparison.
| Doing it manually | Payer-side & clearinghouse tools | Praxigen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whose side it serves | Your staff, unaided | The insurer: utilization-management automation and clearinghouse transaction routing | The practice: a provider-side workspace for your PA team |
| What it optimizes | Nothing is automated | The payer review and eligibility or transaction plumbing | Your documentation against the payer’s own medical-necessity criteria, before you submit |
| Source-grounding | Staff memory and saved PDFs | Proprietary, not shown to the practice | Every claim cites a public payer policy or clinical-trial source you can click |
| Appeals | Written from scratch each time | Generally not the focus | Drafts a policy-cited appeal for your team to review and submit |
| Setup | None, but no leverage either | Integration, enrollment, or clearinghouse connection | Copy-and-paste or de-identified workflow in days; no EHR project to start |
| Who submits | Your team | Varies by tool | Your team. A human reviews and submits; nothing is filed automatically |
| Patient data | Handled in your systems | Varies; often covered entities or business associates | Pilot uses de-identified or sample data; identifiers removed on-device; a BAA precedes any identified records |
Comparison is at the category level and reflects the typical role of each approach; specific products differ. Praxigen does not replace a clearinghouse and makes no approval-rate guarantees.
Common questions
What is the difference between provider-side and payer-side prior authorization tools?
Payer-side tools automate the insurer’s utilization-management review and decisioning, or move eligibility and claims transactions through a clearinghouse. Provider-side tools work for the practice: they help the clinical team prepare documentation that meets the payer’s criteria before submission and build appeals when a denial hits. Praxigen is provider-side and documentation-first.
How is Praxigen different from Cohere Health, Availity, or CoverMyMeds?
Those serve different jobs: payer-side utilization management, eligibility and clearinghouse transactions, or medication prior-authorization routing. Praxigen is a provider-side, documentation-first workspace: it checks the clinical note against the specific payer medical-necessity criteria before submission and drafts policy-cited appeals, with each claim grounded in a cited public source. It is an intelligence layer for the practice, not a payer connection.
Do I need a clearinghouse to use Praxigen?
No. Praxigen does not replace or require a clearinghouse. You can start with a copy-and-paste or de-identified workflow in days, and your team reviews and submits the prepared request and appeal through your existing channels.
Does Praxigen submit prior authorizations automatically?
No. Praxigen prepares the request and the appeal as AI-generated drafts; a person on your team reviews and submits. Nothing is filed under your providers’ names automatically.
See also
See it on your toughest case
Bring a denied or tricky prior authorization (de-identified). We will show you the payer criteria and the evidence behind it, live.
Book a case review